summary
Chernobrov A.A. Theory of Naming and Cultural Mentality.
The author
claims to present a new approach to the problem of correlation between Language
and Culture arguing that no valid and complete linguistic theory can be created
within the framework of pure linguistics. Complete and systematic analysis of
any linguistic theory and language as its object must be philosophically,
epistemologically and psychologically motivated.
The author
considers a number of different and contradictory philosophical positions,
which could determine the structure of linguistic theory. Some of these
positions can be overlapping and interdependent. The choice usually constitutes
the methodological basis of a linguistic theory. A merely psychological choice,
e.g., is also the answer to the question of biological or cultural predominance
in formation of human language competence and performance. The second part of
the article is devoted to the systemic analysis of language.
Reznikov V.M. Philosophical and Methodological Analysis of Statistical Methods in the
Context of Correct Applications.
The paper
examines the adequacy of some fundamental concepts of statistics and
statistical methods for the analysis of causality. It is demonstrated that the
concept «statistical independence» is inadequate for the analysis of causal
connections. First, causal independence is of an essentially asymmetrical
character, whereas statistical independence is symmetric. Secondly, the concept
of statistical independence cannot be quantified. The author also argues for
the inadequacy of the concept of «statistical independence» for applications,
as this concept is fundamental and thus logically indefinable through other
concepts. At the same time, this concept can be given only limited explication
through the coefficient of correlation, and in practice independence is
frequently accepted on intuitive grounds.
The author
offers arguments for the inadequacy of the methods of
confidence
intervals and maximum likelihood for applications. The inadequacy of these
methods is explained by the fact that they are not intended for repeated
experiments and do not provide a check for the stability of the discovered
statistical characteristics.
The method
of confidence intervals employs a semantically incorrect probability of a
constant reaching a fixed interval. In fact, this probability is 1 or 0. The
author argues for the adequacy of Mises’ statistics for applications and
concludes that the role of methodologist is to explicate scientific concepts,
which are not quite substantive, and study real problems and not the problems
of possible worlds.
Zinevich O.V. Evolution of the Christian Attitude to Plato’s Eros in Early Losev.
The paper
considers the contradictory interpretation of Plato’s Eros in the early works
by Losev. Within the framework of the Christian attitude Losev proceeds from
the complete acceptance to almost complete rejection of Plato’s discourse on
love. The evolution of Losev can be described as a transformation from a
disciple whose aim is the secret innermost knowledge of the teacher’s writing
to a judge who wants the accused to plead his paganism.
Eremin S.N. The Students of Novosibirsk State University on their life, studies, and
values.
On the
basis of concrete sociological research the author draws conclusions concerning
the material and inner lives of the students at Novosibirsk State University,
their orientations in life, attitudes towards science and possible emigration. The
author examines the current state and developmental tendencies of NSU as a
reproductive mechanism for the scientific community of the Novosibirsk Science
Center under the conditions of crisis. The author considers internal and
external conditions necessary to maintain the high value of science within the
student community.
Bazarova L.V. The Problem of Property Right in Relation to Possession, Disposition
and Use.
Drawing on
Articles 296 and 298 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the author
analyzes the problem of understanding of the right of possession, disposition
and use. The author discloses the main contradictions in the relations of
property arising from the inadequate development of these concepts and suggests
a legal solution which would be conducive to the effective functioning of
organizations (enterprises, institutions).
Razumovsky O.S. The Concepts of Meso-Object and Meso-System. The Notions of the «Middle»
in the Contexts of Measure, Extremality and Symmetry Theories.
In
ordinary consciousness and theoretical thinking the notions of the «average»
and the «middle» are either considered to be intuitively clear or given a more
strict interpretation with the help of the «golden mean» and the idea of
something being located between certain poles. The latter is the case in the
«temperance ethics» and optimality theory. However, the development of calculus
mathematics brought into focus the question about the nature and essence of its
objects which are essentially different from the transfinite objects of
classical mathematics and mechanics. This led to the introduction of such
concepts as «meso-object» and «meso-system» (see the works of Academician N.N.
Yanenko). In its turn, all behavioral systems (B-systems) are essentially
meso-systems. B-systems are objects of living nature, society and mixed
(hybrid) systems like ecological and human-technical systems. Our goal is to
develop the notions of «the middle», «meso-object» and «meso-system» which are
important for the analysis of B-systems in system studies and optimology.
Let’s
consider the relations between the «big», «small» and the «middle». The first
two are the poles, alternatives, negations of each other and symmetrical
complements. The «middle» is intermediate and expresses the moderation of
quality, location between the two poles, boundaries of something, etc. Following
W.R. Ashby, they can be evaluated by an observer using such a criterion as the
quantity of information required to describe a given system. The corresponding
evaluations will be subjective and will force us: 1) to aggregate or represent
knowledge in the form of schemes, symbols, principles, various models, world
pictures, etc.; 2) to include in the description interactions with the
environment, while preserving the idea of the autonomy of the object; 3) to
take into account the subjectivity of the agent of an action; 4) to take into
account its axiology; 5) to consider the objective and initially inevitable
indeterminacy and ambiguity of the description conditioned by the capacities of
the actor and the determinacy/indeterminacy of the concepts of the «big»,
«small» and «middle», (for example in the spirit of A.J. Bahm’s dialectics.)
Now we
shall turn to the problems of the «largest» and «the least». They are both
always «the largest of…» and «the least of…» a finite set as a meso-object». In
the language of mathematics their equivalents will be «maximum», «minimum» and
their generalization «extremum». The extremalization of the big and the small
gives us the notions of the biggest and the smallest. All these concepts have
been analyzed by the author in the monograph «Extremal Regularities» (Novosibirsk,
1988).
Wedging in
between the big and the small, the «middle» has two meanings: a) a
depersonalized value of some general characteristic of a given set, like the
arithmetical mean, when we also level the droopings of diversity, such as odd
and even; b) when we have an axiological critetion of the value of
characteristics, the middle has the meaning of «the optimal» and acts as a
value measure of the quality, its «norm». On the whole, the relations under
study are chain-like in form: the biggest > the big > the mean > the
small > the smallest, and in the spatial centered form it is : boundary
(edge) < periphery < the midship = center > periphery > boundary. The
center here is part of the midship and the whole chain and its elements within
itself can be also differentiated with the help of the same concepts ( like
«the largest and the smallest of the middle, etc.»)
In the
systems with guidance the graph of the intensity of guidance is a «È-like» curve.
In the
meantime, in the preference structures of B-systems instead of a formal
symmetry of these concepts, there is a bias, drift towards the biggest /
smallest by such criteria as utility, satisfaction, value, beauty, economy,
good, evil, etc. It should be noted that this is the result of the internal
action of various objects, including their dynamics. In synergetics value
thresholds (maximums and minimums) of the spatial scales of the systems are
fixed, not allowing any transitions to stability and coherence (with the
probability of chaos). Synergetics also explains causes and mechanisms of the
«order/chaos» transition. On the whole, the categories of the biggest and the
smallest, similar to the «middle» form external measures and frames for the
big, middle and small.
It should
be underlined that the size characteristics (big and small size) of the systems
are dependant on both extensive factors (quality, a number of subsystems,
levels, etc.) and intensive factors (diversity, measure and speed of development,
causality, functional invariants and goals, rhythm, focus of action, etc.)
Several
important considerations are:
1. The
world of behavioral systems is a world of finite and complex self-organizing
meso-objects located between the megaworld and microworld.
2. The
semantics of the concepts under study is generated by the meaning of the
concept «many», (set), expanding and deepening it. This consideration makes
these concepts convenient instruments for the description of big and complex
systems, meso-systems and their variation, B-systems.
3. The
full meaning of the concepts under study is, on the whole, generated by
ontology in the form of a family of concepts, such as «big», «quantity»,
«quality», «measure», «difference», «certainty», «polarity», «extremality»,
«symmetry / asymmetry». This meaning finds subjective and relative expression
in our approaches to the understanding of differences between our concepts in
accordance with possibilities, aims and goals of their use in theory and in
practice.
4. The
analysis shows that it is possible to get rid of the indeterminacy and
ambiguity in the definition of the conceptual limits under study through: a)
the concept of the «middle»; and b) concepts of «the biggest» and the
«smallest». In mathematics, applied sciences and research, planning,
decision-making, projections, it is possible to do this with the help of the
concepts of the «statistical» or «arithmetic» middle, “maximum”, “minimum”,
“extremum” and others as well as through the methods of harmonization and
finding the «average» in the «golden mean». These approaches and methods are
universal.
5. The
activity and functioning of B-systems is a «big system», as it contains many
elements, multiple connections and factors, etc. which may exist both in «normal»
(averaged by certain criteria) and in extreme (limiting) conditions, and can
also be intentionally directed towards them. The counter-reactions of B-systems
may be alarmist.
6. The
development of cybernetics led to a clear understanding of the principle of
limitations imposed on the parameters, characteristics and laws of functioning
of meso-systems (and B-systems) and on their representation in concepts and
models.
Kamelchuk E.N. Dikj in Homer Poetic (Axiological Premises the Formation of the Theodicy
Problem in the Ancient World Outlook).
The time
period between the IX-VIII and VI-V centuries B.C. introduced an important
change in the hierarchy of Weltanschauung values in ancient Greece. It can be
viewed as an axiological premise of the formation of the theodicy problem:
during this period the demands for the morality of the world order and
justification of patent injustice are becoming more and more pressing.
The
axiological significance of such notions as «regularity», «rationality» and
«just world order» in the texts which came down to us from ancient Greece, can
be shown in different ways. The aim of this article is to demonstrate the
change in the sphere of use of the word d°kj in the light of the further development of the
notions of the just world order in the mytho-poetic tradition.
In the
Iliad the word d°kj is used 5 times and the corresponding adjective d°kaiov – 3 times, in the Odyssey d°kj – 11 times and d°kaiov – 13, i.e. the overall frequency of
usage has grown threefold. At the very least, this testifies to the increased
interest in the word d°kj and its derivatives.
In the
Iliad d°kj is
used in two meanings: 1) court verdicts and decisions (16, 542; 18, 508) and 2)
custom, norm of everyday life, «the right» in the socium (16, 388; 19,
180; 23, 542).
The first
meaning of the word and some details of the scene pictured on Achilles’ shield
(see Il., 18, 497-508) are evidence to the fact that, as early as in Homer’s
poems, the word d°kj has certain connections with the field of law.
Further
evidence to this connection is the passage about people who «use force to make
«crooked» decisions on the agora (skoliv
kr°nwsi qmistav),
(thereby) banishing the «truth» (d°kjn), without fear of the Gods looking (qeòn ípin)» (Il., 16, 387 ff; see Hes. Op., 221, 250, 264). D°kj is used
here in the second meaning: what is banished is the truth, order, social norm,
custom. It should be noted: 1) the look of the Gods is focused on those who
violate order in the society; 2) a clear opposition of d°kj to the
word b°a
(power, might) the meaning of which is close to the original meaning of the
word Äbriv (domination, violence).
The
adjective d°kaiov relies on the second meaning. For example, Agamemnon must be dikaiçterov in
the future (19, 181), i.e. to act in greater accordance with d°kj (custom,
order, social norms), as Athreus’ behavior towards Achilles was patently
outside the boundaries of the norm. This is why the behavior of Agamemnon,
clearly violating the order of the socium, is characterized by the word Äbriv (1, 203
and 214).
In the
Odyssey d°kj is used twice to denote verdicts and decisions (3, 244; 11, 570) and
twice to denote customs and regulations (9, 215; 14, 84).
The
remaining seven cases of the use of d°kj in the Odyssey do not always overstep the
boundaries of the second meaning, but they clearly expand it. Odyssey, for
example, offended none of his subjects by word or deed, as is the custom
(Ó t st° d°kj) of the kings (see 4, 690-692). The narrative
here is about social realia, the behavior of the kings – not about what the
kings ought to do but about what they usually do. Thus, we can list the third
meaning of the word d°kj (which appears only in the Odyssey) which is custom,
usage, habit, the usual course of events, one’s lot, irrespective of the
norms accepted in the society.
There is
no sharp distinction between the second and third meanings (see 11, 218; 19,
42-43; 24, 254-255): they both refer to some norm, but in the first case
it is «the right» (in society), in the second case it is the usual (in
general). This expands the sphere of meanings of the word d°kj: and, in
our opinion, this explains more frequent use of this term in the Odyssey
compared to the Iliad.
Out of the
seven uses of the word d°kj in the Odyssey in the meaning «custom», «habit»,
(with more or less intersection with the second meaning) five correspond to the
formula “d°kj st°” (4, 691; 11, 218; 14, 59; 19, 43; 24, 255). It
shows that d°kj is beginning to cross (both meanings and the mode of phrase formation)
with the word qmiv. This fact allows Hesiod to deify Dike as one of
the Horae, daughters of Zeus and Themis, protectors of the regularities of the Seasons and
vegetation cycle (see Theog. 902).
Sctlia rga (14, 83) of Penelope’s wooers opposes d°kj as a social norm (18, 274-280). This is why in the Odyssey the notion Äbriv and its
derivatives are applied mainly to wooers. The adjective d°kaiov is still dependant on the second meaning of the
word d°kj. But
we should note a more clear-cut opposition of what corresponds to the social
norm and what is opposite this norm.
Conclusions:
1. There
is growing interest to the term d°kj and its derivatives from the Iliad to the Odyssey
which is connected with the expansion of its semantic field.
2. The new
meaning will play an important role in the deifying of Dike (a daughter of Zeus
and Themis) as one of the protectors of the regularity of the yearly cycle.
3. The
opposition of d°kj to Äbriv becomes more clear from the Iliad to the Odyssey
(Äbriv of Agamemnon is criticized less than Äbriv of the wooers).
4. As
early as in the Iliad, the word d°kj has some connection with the field of law.
This is important, as in «Works and Days» the Goddess Dike will
primarily preside over courts and trials.
5. In the
Iliad (see 16, 384 ff) it is pointed out that banishment of custom d°kj from the
society is punished by some kind of misfortune (floods), which originates from
Zeus himself (cf. Od., 14, 83-84). This scene foretells the formation of a new
world outlook. As early as in Gesiod’s texts, these views are considered
significant.
Karpovitch V.N. The problem of empirical significance for theoretical concepts in legal
studies.
The author
examines the most general properties of law as a rational system. Legal rules
are conceived as theoretical prescriptions and can be interpreted and
reinterpreted in the legal process. This perspective allows to look at the
theoretical concepts in legal studies as empirically significant terms defined
both by deontic prescriptions and by the state of affairs that can be subsumed
under these prescriptions. The most striking example of the interdependence is
the normative definition of a state and its relation to historical descriptions
of existing states: the pure logical and prescriptive construction remains
empirically meaningless notwithstanding the efforts to connect it to the real
historical examples. Science is descriptive, its laws describe regularities of
nature and/or society, and a scientific theory has explanatory and predictive
power. Law is prescriptive; a legal system has justificatory and coordinative
power. The prescriptive nature of law points clearly to the dependence of legal
systems and legal concepts on deontic logic, even if on the surface they seem
to be analysed in purely descriptive terms. This is shown on the fundamental
concept of a legal gap which is usually defined without explicit use of deontic
terms. Legal norms could not be true or false because of their prescriptive
character, and that is why justice should not be identified with truth, and
legal confirmation with empirical confirmation. In particular, state of affairs
are not identical to legal findings: the former is described in nonlegal
language, the latter in the technical language of law. The very possibility of
the subsumption of the states of affairs under the corresponding findings is
not a purely logical problem and depends on the existence of appropriate interpretative
rules. The legislator cannot be expected to formulate all the rules of
correspondence required for the efficient application of law, and the
connection of the legal system with the domain of application is largely the
task of adjudication. This «open texture» character of formal normative
constructs in legal theory allows to draw parallels to the interpretation of
the theoretical constructs in science. The gap between normative system and
real life is filled by the historical facts transformed to law by a legal
authority. In this way new «rules of correspondence» are created which connect
normative system to the behavior it is intended to regulate.
Marchinin V.V.,
Udalova I.V. Interethnic Relations in Ethnically-Mixed
Settlements of Khanty-Mansiisk Autonomous Okrug (based on sociological research
of 1991, 1994, 1996, 1997).
The
authors present some conclusions of their long-term program of study of the
state, factors of influence and dynamics of inter-territorial relations in
rural settlements with mixed national population (the program headed by V.V.
Markhinin). They describe the relationships between, on the one hand, ethnic
groups of indigenous population – Khanti, Mansi, Nenets, and, on the other
hand, between the local Russian (also Ukrainian and Byelorussian) population,
first of all, the population of old-settlers.
Concrete
sociological research conducted in the 1990-s, covered 29 settlements located
on the territory of the traditional northern production land in 6 (out of 8)
districts of the okrug: Nizhnevartovsk, Kondinsk, Surgut, Berezovsk, Oktyabrsk,
Khanty-Mansiisk.
Within the
general program each research project had its own distinctive features
conditioned by the place and, especially, time of the experiment. The program
started during the years of «perestroika», before the break-up of the Soviet
Union, and covers the whole period of presidency of B.N. Yeltsin, giving a
mirror-like reflection of the growth of destructive tendencies of the policy
followed by President and his governments which had a negative effect, among
other things, on the inter-ethnic relations in the okrug.
In 1991,
when «perestroika» was drawing to an end, the authors studied the way of life,
ethnicity of the northern people, inter-ethnic relations in connection with the
development of new economic relations in the country and in the okrug itself,
and the organization of production (cooperative and partnership, including
national, joint-stock partnerships, ancestral lands – family possession of
production land and others).
The
results of the sociological research and other materials, personal observations
of the authors showed that the way of life and ethnic self-consciousness of the
indigenous northern people can be characterized as affected by crisis.
Representatives
of the northern peoples themselves saw the biggest threat to the way of life
and integrity of their ethnos in drunkenness and alcoholism, in the destruction
of natural environment as a result of the industrial development of the region,
in the loss of ethnic and cultural traditions. In our respondents’ view, the
inter-ethnic relations were adversely affected by such developments as
squeezing of the native-born population from the sphere of traditional trades
and isolated cases of disrespect towards their ethnic and cultural traditions
and customs.
Although
all the above-mentioned events are a cause for concern, the overall situation
was quite favorable and perceived as such. The prevalence of the optimistic
mood was explained by a promise of the social and economic innovations as part
of “perestroika”. Preference was given to the renovated collective and family
(ancestral land) forms of the organization of the traditional production
activities of the indigenous population and old-settlers.
However, in
later years, when «perestroika» was followed by the course of «radical
reforms», social and economic consequences of the «reforms» (the decline in
production and living standards, unemployment, social stratification, etc.)
began to come to the forefront as factors undermining the way of life of the
local population, and conditions of the ethnic development of the indigenous
people in particular. These factors became most important and caused tensions
in inter-ethnic relations.
Later on,
as was demonstrated by the research of 1994, 1996 and 1997, the negative role
of these factors was continually increasing. They also provoked inter-ethnic
tensions, alongside the problem of allocation of «ancestry land», faulty
opinions about the existence of «privileges on ethnic grounds» and «fight for
power between nationalities», i.e. for representation in the local governing
bodies.
Despite
these factors contributing to inter-ethnic tensions, the whole sphere of
inter-ethnic relations remains very stable. The foundation for the stability is
long history of inter-ethnic communities which are characterized by a high
degree of ethno-cultural and ethno-demographic interpenetrating of the local
ethnic groups and old settlers.
The
article shows the dialectical interplay of various factors contributing to the
tensions in inter-ethnic relations, and the sources of stability of this sphere
originating from the ethno-cultural integrity of inter-ethnic communities;
examines the dynamics of this process as a whole.
The source
of the stability of inter-ethnic relations, as well as for the opposition to
the destructive consequences of the «radical reforms» lies in the development
of the system of local government. This process should rely on the cultural
traditions of the local inter-ethnic communities, the traditional preferences
of the collective (communal) forms of the organization of the production. Renovation
of these forms initiated during “perestroika”, should also be taken into
account. The final part of the article examines the development of the system
of local government.
Markov Y.G. The Basin Principle of the Water Fund Management: Organizational and
Legal Aspects.
The
article contains arguments for the basin principle of water fund management. It
is shown that the combination of the basin and administrative-territorial
approaches declared in the Water Code of the Russian Federation, in practice
leads to the weakening of the role of the basin management structures in such
areas as control and protection of the water objects. The author offers a
two-level management system of regional water-industrial systems (on the level
of river basins of the 1-st and 2-nd order) which includes the widening of the
functions of basin administrations and the degree of their direct involvement
in the formation of the state territorial programs of sustainable development.
Shmakov V.S. R.G. Kollingwood’s Philosophy of History.
This paper
examines Kollingwood’s notion of the philosophy of history and gives a short
summary of his views on the distinctive features of historical knowledge. The
author emphasizes Kollingwood’s dual definition of historical understanding as
a history of «scissors and clue» (history of compilation) and its subjective
interpretation by the historian during his work. From Kollingwood’s point of
view, true historical research is «thinking through» historical events,
creating a picture of the past using a priori imagination in the process of
historical explanation.
Bogatyreva O.A.,
Shillerov A.E. Modeling of Social Processes: a Hypothetical Way
of Origin of Ancestry Based on the Kin Group in Humans.
This paper
offers a new method of analysis of the social processes. It allows to study a
system in dynamics, using such parameters which are, essentially, the
individual characteristics, i.e. the social rank of individuals.
The
workability of our original method is shown by its application to the
hypothetical emergence of kin, tribe and ancestral relationships in humans. This
method allows to compute the relative social entropy index for the
socio-demographic processes. It has a good prognostic potential, diagnosing a
phase in the social system development and predicting potential furcation
points.
Nalivaiko N.V. The Conception of Legal Education: the Problem of Formation.
This paper
examines the problems of legal education. The author notes that high expenditure
on the police, courts and other judicial and repression structures in support
of legal order and consciousness seldom brings about desired effects, and draws
attention to the legal education and upbringing. They are aimed at forming a
creative personality with intrinsic motivation for self-perfection, development
and law observance, who would follow the law for the sake of personal security.
Fofanov V.P. The World History as Reflection of Civilizations.
The
development of the conception of civilization is viewed as an act of emergence
of the civilization’s self-consciousness. Critically overcoming the
subject-centricity of the civilization, the author offers a new grouping of
various conceptions of civilizations. He introduces the notion of the reflection
of civilizations as a special type of inter-subjective interactions, which are
viewed as a most important mechanism of social development determining the
regularities of the world history.
Bobrov V.V. Sustainable Social Development: the Economic Aspect.
This paper
continues a series of the author’s publications in this Journal on the problem
of sustainable social development. Basing his analysis on the needs of man,
social groups and society, the author offers a socio-philosophical analysis of economic
theories, uncovers the sources of the self-development of economic processes
and formulates methodological recommendations from the standpoint of national
state interests.
Chernenko A.K. The State of Law: the Problems of Construction.
The author
offers an original approach in the framework of the philosophy of law towards
the genesis of the state of law, justification of its features and
characteristics, and methods of construction. The paper considers the problem
of choosing a model of the state of law in modern Russia, offers a new
perspective on the relationship of state and person, natural and positive law. Special
attention is paid to the methods of legal technology as a methodology of
constructing a state of law based on the criteria of effectiveness and
rationality.
Simanov A.L. Vaiœeºika Philosophy of nature and modern cosmology: possibels parallels.
In the
first part of the paper there is shouh that vaiœeºika
philosophy of nature is a conception of “two real worlds” – thing world which
is percepted by senses and non-thing world which is percepted only in a special
yoge state. That is why paramanavas-atoms belong to non-thing world. Thing
world is formal by uniting those atoms into triades. Such a unit determines
structure of things as well as well as space, including its
three-dimensionality.
Suprun V.I. Political Science under the impact of social transformation.
The main
thesis of this article is that under the pressure of social change, the
political science can’t remain as the self-perpetuating system, but has to
respond to the challenges of shifting cultural and political structures, e.g.
Russia lately. The second dimension is that it has to start or continue the
dialogue with new social science and interpreting models, e.g. futures studies
or cross cultural analysis. The third aspect of the problem is that the
traditional categories e.g. ”power”, “ideology”, “state”, “social factors” etc.
need to be reinterpreted and looked upon a new.
Shevchenko A.A. The «Learned Ignorance»: Skepticism and Postmodernism.
The
article reexamines the well-known phenomenon of the «learned ignorance» and
develops the thesis that the respectable tradition of «learned ignorance»
represented by Socrates, Pyrrhon, Nicholas of Cusa, finds its continuation in
the so-called philosophy of «postmodernity». The author analyzes the main
similarities and differences between the skeptics of antiquity and philosophers
of «postmodernity», which encompasses postmodernism proper, as well as
philosophies sharing many of its assumptions, e.g. neo-pragmatism of R.Rorty.
The first
feature jointly shared by both skepticism and the philosophy of postmodernity
is their antidogmatism. While this position of the skeptic finds its
expression in the suspension of judgement, in the philosophy of «postmodernity»
the premise about the existence of the objective is declared either «not
useful» or superfluous. Instead, there exists a plurality of discourses, due to
the equality of various discourse kinds and texts. The truth is important not
in itself, but as a instrument regulating people’s behavior.
The second
common feature closely related to the first is the refusal to claim the
possession of the truth. This refusal is backed by different arguments in
skepticism and postmodernism and leads to different consequences. In skepticism
this refusal is temporary and «personal», in the philosophy of «postmodernity»
the ignorance is universal, resulting from the emptiness of the very notion of
the «objective truth». Language is contingent in relation to the person and
hence, the truth is also contingent. The distinction between appearance and
reality is discarded by the refusal to recognize the objective reality, which
is replaced with a multiplicity of world pictures contingent on culture, time, age,
nationality, language, etc.
The third
similarity between skepticism and postmodernism lies in the “learned» nature
of ignorance. The skeptic comes to know the boundaries of his knowledge by
establishing the unreliable nature of sensual perceptions or the fallibility of
judgements.
The
philosophers of postmodernity, noting that individual perceptions and
judgements are loaded with cultural (political, ethnic, gender) and other
factors, also show mistrust to «metanarratives», which, in Liotard’s view, are
the most essential feature of postmodernism.
The fourth
common feature of the ancient skeptics and philosophers of postmodernity is
that in both schools the learned ignorance has both cognitive and ethical
dimensions – the «epoche» in the first case, and the emphasis on the importance
of consensus in the second. Both skepticism and postmodernism pay the same
price for emphasizing the ethical dimension – the suspension of the truth or
even the rejection of the very notion of truth.
One more
similarity consists in the connection between the theoretical and practical
«components» of learned ignorance. The practical goal is dominant both is
scepticism and in the philosophy of «postmodernity». In the first case it is ataraxia,
in the second case there are practical and even political ends, for example,
the study of the role of gender, racial and cultural differences, which should
reveal social and cultural dimensions of knowledge and language. Cognitive
efforts and conclusions are subordinated to and dependent on the political
context (in the broad sense of the word).
It seems
that the interpretation of the philosophy of “postmodernity” in the spirit of
the tradition of the «learned ignorance» helps to draw attention to the
development of this tendency and its radicalization. This claim can be
supported by analyzing radical changes in the meaning of such concepts as
«reality», «truth», «language» and the refusal to recognize many traditional
dichotomies, such as «subject – object», «appearance – reality».
What comes
after postmodernity ? The author supports the view that the only viable
alternative to an infinite rotation in the circle of equally justified
discourses is to step back and attempt to reconcile some of the most important
insights of postmodernism (the role of scientific, cultural, political, ethnic,
gender factors) with traditional values of European rationalism. It is argued
that this return to the rationalist «roots» is a promising attempt to
synthesize the «truth» of postmodernism with our fundamental intuitions about
the reality, truth and language which cannot be easily discarded.
Plusnin Y.M.,
Dolmatova G.V., Plus’nin V.M. The Fundamental Values
of Today’s Russia: Direction of Change.
The
socio-psychological study of 1477 respondents conducted in 1995-1998 revealed
evidence about the dynamics of the world outlook values in the period of the
systemic crisis of the Russian society. The individual structure of the
intrinsic (base, self-sufficient) life values moves towards the pole of the
lower values of physical safety and material well-being, in accordance with our
earlier forecast of these changes made on the basis of the hypothesis of the
«social swing of values». This process is considered to be
«socially-unfavorable».
Goran V.P. The Genetic Link of Philosophy and Democracy in Ancient Greece.
This paper
is a sequel to the one published in the preceding issue of this Journal (1998,
¹1). There the author examined the first of the two difficulties in defending
the thesis about the genetic link of the philosophy and democracy in Ancient
Greece. Here he examines the second difficulty. Its essence lies in the fact
that there were thinkers among the early Greek philosophers, for example,
Pythagorus and Heraclitus, who were guided by the aristocratic rather than
democratic values. The difficulty is solved if we take into account that their
philosophical views were influenced by the certain changes of the aristocratic
world outlook of that age. And these changes manifestly correspond to the
social process related to the establishment of democracy.
Boyko V.I. “The Family: Social Conditions of Demographic Reproduction”.
The paper
offers methodological approaches towards studying interacting and interrelated
objective and subjective factors influencing the demographic behavior of the
modern family. Of the variety of factors (picture 1) the author concentrates on
such objective and specific factors as the family policy of the state and the
current state of Russia under the conditions of crisis. He offers a scheme of a
coordinated interaction of the elements of the state policy which have
determined the demographic behavior of the family (picture 3). In particular,
the author analyses the lack of coordination between the two systems of norms
and values: on the one hand, it is the model of the person which has to be
reproduced in the process of socialization. This model is prescribed by the
state. On the other hand, it’s family norms and ideals of this person. The
axiological disintegration leads to the disbalance between the views of the
state and the family on the reproduction of the person of the future and, in
large part, determines the behavior of the family.
The author
notes the necessity to include in the conceptual scheme of analysis the
structure and volume of resources allocated to the maintenance and
socialization of the child and channeled both through the public funds and
directly to the family. He also examines the importance and influence of such a
component as the “culture of needs” (status and functional) which are formed by
the state via public values and considered by the marriage partners important
for their own (non-demographic) life.
Neciporenko O.V.,
Volski A.N. Evolution of the social modernization paradigm.
The paper
analyses the social modernization paradigm development developed by western
philosophers, economists and sociologists.
The idea
of three stages in the development of mankind by O.Kont, historical materialism
by K.Marx, the concept of «rationalization» by M.Weber, «abstraction» by
G.Zimmel, the role of «social differentiation» by T.Parsons formed the basis
for the modernization theory.
The next
stage in the development of the modernization paradigm was the related to the
idea that the traditional society influenced by modernization can change into
some intermediate forms characterized by the strengthening of traditional
systems and possessing the ability for relatively sustainable reproduction.
In Russia
we can consider all these processes as the next stage of the «overtaking»
modernization which doesn’t run counter to the processes taking place in the
rest of the world.
Tselishchev V.V. Synchronous and Asynchronous Incommensurability.
The paper
examines the use of the term «incommensurability» in various contexts which
alongside the term “paradigm”has become a metaphorical rather than a literal
term.
The author
distinguished between the two major uses of this term: «asynchronous
incommensurability», which is usually used in the discussions about the “paradigms”
understood as various historical styles of thinking, and “synchronous
incommensurability» where the term «incommensurability» relates to the
conceptual frameworks or theories representing a more or less homogeneous state
of knowledge in a certain area.
This
distinction could help to eliminate the confusion between these two uses of the
term. This confusion is exemplified in the article by analysing R.Rorty’s uses
of the term «incommensurability». The author notes that in the “Philosophy and
the Mirror of Nature» hermeneutics appeals to asynchronous incommensurability,
while the justification of the hermeneutics relies on synchronous
incommensurability.
Thus, we
have to deal with three types of problems, which should be discussed in order
to clarify the relationship between synchronous and asynchronous
incommensurability.
1) The use
of the term “incommensurability” both in epistemological and hermeneutical
contexts presupposes the elimination of the distinction between the humanities
and physical sciences. This step needs to be justified.
2) The
second problem is the shift of focus made by Rorty – from the comparison of the
meaning of the term in different paradigms to the comparison of epistemology
and hermeneutics per se. The author explains his reservations about this shift.
3) The
author questions Rorty’s refusal to see the incommensurability of the
conceptual frameworks in epistemology.
Thus,
justifying the elimination of distinction between the synchronous and
asynchronous incommensurability Rorty, in fact, uses more complex concepts than
the concept of asynchronous incommensurability.The analysis of such conceptions
as reference theory and antirealism requires an appeal to the conceptual fields
and theoretical frameworks which lie outside the problem of incommensurability
as it is. The reasons for Rorty’s strategy are quite obvious: he takes
synchronous incommensurability to be the fundamental notion required for the
justification of the hermeneutical procedure which, for him, is an alternative
way to the comparison of scientific theories. However, the relevant concept for
such a comparison is the concept of asynchronous commensurability or
incommensurability because synchronous commensurability or incommensurability
is, in fact, a different problem which has to be discussed in a wider framework
of theoretical problems.