Igor V. BERESTOV

Education, Academic degrees and Academic experience

Since 2008 – Senior Research Fellow, Department of Philosophy, Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences.

2006 – 2008 – Research Fellow, Department of Philosophy, Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences.

2004 – Ph.D. (“Candidate of Sciences”) in Philosophy. Specialization: History of Philosophy. (Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences).

Dissertation: “ The Problem of Freedom in Plotinus’ Philosophy ”. (In Russian)

Summary of Dissertation . (In Russian)

Since 2003 – Assistant, Epistemology and history of philosophy chair, Philosophy department, Novosibirsk State University, Russia, Novosibirsk (nowadays – History of philosophy chair, Institute of Philosophy and Law, Novosibirsk State University).

2001 – 2006 – Junior Research Fellow, Department of Philosophy, Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences.

2000 – M.A. in Philosophy, qualification “history of philosophy”, Philosophy department, Novosibirsk State University.

1995–1997 – 9th grade Programmer, Institute of Geology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk.

1994 – B.S. (“Specialist”) in Geology, qualification “geophysicist”, Geology and geophysics department, Novosibirsk State University.

Research interests

Analytic history of philosophy, methodology of the history of philosophy, intentional identity, mental holism, semantic holism, infinite regress arguments, theory of argumentation, Eleatic arguments against plurality, Leibniz’s Law, doxastic logic, propositional attitudes reports.

Principal Publications

Monographs and Multi-authored Monographs

Berestov I. V., Domanov O. A., Volf M. N. Analytic History of Philosophy: Methods and Essays. Novosibirsk: Offset TM, 2019. xviii, 242 p. (In Russian)

Goran V. P., Volf M. N., Berestov I. V., Orlov E. V., Afonasin E. V., Butakov P. A.. Rationalism and Irrationalism in Ancient Philosophy. A multi-authored monograph. Novosibirsk, SB RUS Publishing, 2010. 396 p. Chapter III “Ways to Overcome a paradoxicality of Parmenides’ Self-referential Statements”. P. 120-186. (In Russian)

Berestov I. V. The Freedom in Plotinus’ Philosophy. Saint Petersburg State University Publ., 2007. 382 p. (In Russian)

Textbooks & Teaching aids

ΑΡΧΗΓΟΣ. Lectures and Studies in Ancient Philosophy (Teaching aids). Ed. by E. V. Afonasin and M. N. Volf. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University Publ., 2015. 170 p. Chapter “Reasons of Third Man Argument Efficiency in Plato’s Parmenides ”. 35-68. (In Russian)

Selected paper from Scopus and WoS Core Collection indexed journals

Berestov I. V. ‘An Extension of Argumentation Structures with an Objectification of Discussions’Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science , 50 (2019), 21–29. (In Russian) DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/50/2.

Berestov I. V. ‘Deficiency in Aristotle’s and Aquinas’s Transmission of Forms Theory’Tomsk State University Journal, 439 (2019), 73–84. (In Russian) DOI: 10.17223/15617793/439/9.

Berestov I. V. ‘Application of Walter Edelberg’s Perspectivalist Semantics in the Methodology of the History of Philosophy. Part II: Types of Term Meanings’Tomsk State University Journal , 438 (2019), 62–73. (In Russian) DOI: 10.17223/15617793/438/8.

Berestov I. V. ‘Application of Walter Edelberg’s Perspectivalist Semantics in the Methodology of the History of Philosophy. Part I: A Statement of the Problem’Tomsk State University Journal , 436 (2018), 69–81. (In Russian) DOI: 10.17223/15617793/436/8.

Berestov I. V., Tikhonov A. V. ‘The Logical Structure of the Epicurean Objection to Skeptics from Adv. Math. VIII, 337’Schole , 12.2 (2018), 659–668. (In Russian) DOI: 10.21267/schole.12.2.22.

Berestov I. V. ‘Why Meno’s Paradox is More Stubborn than Aristotle’s Solution Suggests?’Schole , 11.2 (2017), 505–514. (In Russian) DOI: 10.21267/AQUILO.2017.11.6477.

Berestov I. V. ‘Can Aristotle Solve Meno’s Paradox in the Case of Search for a Species?’Vestnik SPbU. Philosophy and conflicttology , 33.4 (2017), 446–455. (In Russian) DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.406.

Berestov I. V. ‘A Common Root of a Theory of Testimonial Religious Knowledge and Some Skeptical Arguments’Epistemology & Philosiphy of Science , 53.3 (2017), 48–57. (In Russian) DOI: 10.5840/eps201753345.

Berestov I. V. ‘A Holistic Assumptions in the Third Argument of Gorgias’ treatise “On Non-Being”” ,Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science , no. 4(36), (2016), 28–38. (In Russian) DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/36/3.

Berestov I. V. ‘Gorgias’ of Leontinoi Arguments as an Evidence for Philosophical Significance of Problem about Intentional Identity’ ,Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science , 2(34), (2016), 259–268. (In Russian) DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/34/31.

Berestov I. V. ‘Parmenides’ Premises in Protagoras’ Homo Mensura ’ ,Sсhole , 10.2 (2016), 659–670. (In Russian) DOI: 10.21267/AQUILO.2016.10.2967.